The Journal of Turkish Family Physician

  • Home
  • Ethics & Policies
  • Evaluation & Publication
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Submission
  • Journal Archive
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Vol.11 Issue.4 · October-December 2020
Page: 179-190 Research Article 733x viewed
Previous ArticleNext Article

Evaluation of approaches of gestational diabetes screening test in pregnant women

Share :
Published Online: 25 December 2020 · Accepted: 24 November 2020 · Received: 13 July 2020
Doi: 10.15511/tjtfp.20.00479
Cite Code: The Journal of Turkish Family Physician 2020;11(4):179-190
Authors: Nurten Dalgıç 1 · Zeynep Aşık 2 · Mehmet Özen 3
1 Gündoğmuş District State Hospital, Family Medicine Clinic, Antalya
2 Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Res. Assist. Dr. Antalya, Turkey
3 Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Family Medicine Clinic, Antalya / Turkey

Alıntı Kodu: Dalgıç N. ve ark. Gebelerin gestasyonel diyabet tarama testine yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi.
Jour Turk Fam Phy 2020; 11 (4): 179-190. Doi: 10.15511/tjtfp.20.00479.


Keywords: Gestational diabetes mellitus · Glucose tolerance test · Pregnancy
PDF - Evaluation of approaches of gestational diabetes screening test in pregnant women
Print
Abstract
References

Objective: The aim of this study to evaluate the approaches of pregnant women to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening test.

Methods: 102 women with gestational age is 24-28 week, at the age of 18 and over, who were not diagnosed with Type I or Type II DM before the pregnancy, with a single pregnancy, were included in the study. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women, risk factors for GDM, whether GDM screening test and the reasons why pregnant women did not have screening test were questioned. Weight, body mass index, plasma glucose measurements and OGTT results of pregnant women with and without GDM risk factors were compared.

Results: 53 (51.96%) of 102 pregnant women included in the study did not have GDM screening test. As the reason for not having a test; seven (13.2%) of the pregnant women thought that they should be screened with another method without sugar, six (11.3%) did not recommend by their doctor, six (11.3%) read in the media that test was harmful, six (11.3%) thought that test would harm the baby, and six (11.3%) stated that they did not know about the test. Ten (18,9%) did not report any reason. The rate of women in the risk group for GDM was 87.3%. The highest risk factor was the maternal age above 25 years (79.4%). In addition, 27,4% of pregnant women had first-degree relatives with Type II DM, 8,8% had a history of giving birth more than 4 kg in their previous pregnancy and 3.9% of women were diagnosed with GDM in their previous pregnancy. In pregnant women in the risk group for GDM; the mean age, weight, BMI and 50 g OGTT result were significantly higher than the other group. GDM was detected in six of 49 women had OGTT and all were in the risk group.

Conclusion: GDM screening test rates of pregnant women are gradually decreasing. This is not due to educational level or socio-demographic characteristics. Pregnant women receive false information, especially through the media, and the importance of the issue cannot be understood adequately. Health personnel have important duties; risk factors that are proven to be associated with GDM should be questioned at first encounter with pregnant women. Screening test should be performed in early pregnancy in risky pregnant, who do not want to have screening tests should be followed up frequently with blood glucose measurements.

References

  1. Metzger BE, Coustan DR. Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care 1998;21(Suppl 2):161-7.
  2. Mauricio D, Balsells M, Morales J, Corcoy R, Puig-Domingo M, de Leiva A. Islet cell autoimmunity in women with gestational diabetes and risk of progression to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev 1996; 12(4):275-85.
  3. Akbay E, Torun Sİ, Yalçınkaya H, Uzunçakmak C, Toklucu G. Prevalence of gestational diabetes among pregnant women attending in MD Sadi Konuk training and research hospital. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst 2010; 20(3):170-5.
  4. Durnwald C. Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy: Screening and diagnosis. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/diabetes-mellitus-
    in-pregnancy-screening-and-diagnosis adresinden 05.03.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  5. Azal O. Pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Turkiye Klinikleri J EndocrinSpecial Topics 2010; 3(1):6-13.
  6. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarinar U, Coustan DR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(19):1991-2002.
  7. Sagün M, Tosun M, Malatyalıoğlu E, Çetinkaya M, Alper T, Kökçü A. Gestasyonel diabet taramasında 50 gram oral glukoz testinin etkinliği. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi 2008; 5(4):258-62.
  8. Diabetes Mellitus Ve Komplikasyonlarının Tanı, Tedavi Ve İzlem Kılavuzu. TEMD. 12. Baskı, 2019:171-84. http://temd.org.tr/ admin/uploads/tbl_kilavuz/201908190958542019tbl_kilavuzb48da47363.pdf adresinden 22.08.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  9. Türkiye Diyabet Vakfı, Ulusal Diyabet Konsensus Grubu: Gebelik ve Diyabet. Diyabet Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi 2019. 9. Baskı. İstanbul, Türkiye Diyabet Vakfı Yayını, 2019: 140.
  10. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768–73.
  11. Cianni GD, Gualdani E, Berni C, Meucci A, Roti L, Lencioni C, et al. Screening for gestational diabetes in Tuscany, Italy. A population study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2017; 132:149-56.
  12. Desdicioğlu R, Yıldırım M, Süleymanova İ, Atalay İ, Özcan M, Yavuz AF. Gebe kadınların antenatal testlere yaklaşımını etkileyen faktörler. Ankara Med J 2017; 17(1):57-64.
  13. Yaprak M, Gümüştakım RŞ, Tok A, Doğaner A. Determination of oral glucose tolerance test awareness in pregnancy. Ankara Med J 2019; 19(3):635-47.
  14. Başbuğ A, Kaya AE, Sönmez CI, Yıldırım E. Gestasyonel diyabet taramasında karşılaşılan önemli bir problem: Gebeler neden oral glukoz tolerans testi yaptırmak istemiyor? Konuralp Tıp Dergisi 2018; 10(2):144-8.
  15. Avci DK, Oner E. Examination of the knowledge, attitude and behaviours of pregnant women on screening tests made during pregnancy. East J Med 2018;23(2):84-9.
  16. Koyucu RG. Gestasyonel diyabet risk faktörleri çerçevesinde gebelerin glukoz tolerans testine ilişkin tutumları. Sağlık ve
    Toplum 2018; 28(2):65-72.
  17. Schwartz N, Green M.S, Yefet E, Nachum Z. Modifiable risk factors for gestational diabetes recurrence. Endocrine 2016; 54: 714-22.
  18. Di Cianni G, Volpe L, Lencioni C, Miccoli R, Cuccura I, Ghio A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for gestational diabetes assessed by universal screening. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003; 62:131–7.
  19. Kaya H. Gebelerde gestasyonel Diabetes Mellitus taramasında bozulmuş açlık glukozunun değerlendirilmesi. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, İstanbul, 2007.
  20. Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Yilmaz S, Yeral MI, Seckin KD, Erkaya S, Danisman AN. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester: comparison of C-reactive protein, fasting plasma glucose, insulin and insulin sensitivity indices. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28:1957-62.
  21. Correa PJ, Venegas P, Palmeiro Y, Albers D, Rice G, Roa J, et al. First trimester prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using plasma biomarkers: a case-control study. J Perinat Med 2019; 47(2):161-8.
  22. Jang HC. Gestational diabetes in Korea: incidence and risk factors of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes. Diabetes Metabolism Journal 2011;35:1–7.  
  23. Yang H, Wei Y, Gao X, Xu X, Fan L, He J, et al. China National GDM Survey Working Group. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women: a prospective study of 16,286 pregnant women in China. Diabet Med 2009; 26:1099–104.
  24. Shargorodsky M, Kovo M, Schraiber L, Bar J. Does a first degree family history of diabetes impact placental maternal and fetal vascular circulation and inflammatory response? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102(9):3375-80.
  25. Keshavarz M, Cheung NW, Babaee GR, Moghadam HK, Ajami ME, Shariati M. Gestational diabetes in Iran: incidence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 69:279–86.
  26. Östlund I, Hanson U. Repeated random blood glucose measurements as universal screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83:46-51.
Related Posts
The effect of sociodemographic characteristics on healthy lifestyle behaviors in pregnant women registered Family Health Center
Psychosocial Health Level and Related Factors in Pregnancy
Thyroid Assessment of Different Age Groups
The Effect Of Pregnancy Over Sexual Life

Kapak Picture
  • Latest Issue
  • Journal Archive

Article Checklist

We recommend that you look at the checklist to review your article for The Journal of Turkish Family Physician.

Most Popular

  • Yolk Sac Size Can Predict Miscarriage

    Research Article · 12 November 2013

  • Hepatosteatosis (Fatty Liver Disease)

    Review · 18 June 2011

  • Neisseria gonorrhoea: Gonorrhoea and antibiotic resistance

    Research Article · 20 March 2016

  • The effects of nutrition, other environmental factors and microbiota on the epigenetics of obesity

    Review · 30 December 2017

  • The role and future of artificial intelligence in primary care

    Review · 31 March 2024

e-ISSN: 2148-550X
Baş Editör
Prof. Dr. Arzu Uzuner

Copyright Logo Copyright Logo 2

The Journal of Turkish Family Physician (e-ISSN 2148-550X) is a peer-reviewed national periodical journal published four times a year, quarterly on-line only. The journal can include all scientific, evidence-based articles in both Turkish and English, such as research articles, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, national and international scientific documents and translations, which are related to general medicine and family medicine and primary health care services.

© Copyright 2025 - The Journal of Turkish Family Physician - Tasarım ve Uygulama KarmaVA & Medikal Akademi
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed